Adriana
Di Cillo (Drix) is a Spanish/Brazilian director, choreographer,
dramatist, coach, dancer and actor with vast international
experience. Her artistic education started at the age of four and has
included along a lifetime of dedication, western classical ballet, modern and
contemporary dance, acting, Spanish flamenco, Latin-american dances, such as
Brazilian samba, lambada, salsa, and Argentinean tango, martial arts,
Indian classical dances (Bharatanatyam and Kathak) and Film directing. For
the last 18 years Adriana has ventured through the routes which
trace back the eastern origins of flamenco art, having worked and researched
extensively in 4 of the 5 continents: Americas, Europe, Asia and northern
Africa. Adriana has performed in very auspicious stages such as The House of
Blues, Luna Park and Hollywood Bowl in Los Angeles, the Music Academy of Madras
and the Sangeet Natak Academy of Lucknow in India. She has coached,
choreographed and performed for several dance companies as well as various
social projects worldwide. Adriana Di Cillo is the President and General
Director of the Mundaka Arte & Cultura Org, a cross-culture NGO that promotes
the interaction and exchange between different artistic manifestations.
Please
tell us about your association with dancing. How did you develop an interest
towards it?
I
believe as Ana Pavlova says: "I danced from the moment I could
stand", but started learning dance formally at the age of four. I asked my
mother to take me to a ballet school and thanks God she heard me.
Actually I am forever thankful to her, who as a doctor had a clear
understanding on the essential place of arts and sports in the building of a
child's personality. Along the years, as I became more and more involved and
dance became my path in life, the very meaning of my existence, she also
continued to support me.
How did
your tryst with India happen? Based on your experience, do you think that it is
more difficult for a Non-Indian to learn Indian classical dance?
India to
me has been from my teenage hood a homelike culture where i found such deep
identification, from the arts, the food, the arquetypes, the dress codes, the
myths, to the languages.. it all seem so familiar to me... I normally say
that I have European decadency and Indian ascendency.
Now
dance is a language spoken throughout the world by its uncountable dialects.
Learning any foreign dance demands a deep understanding on its regional cultural
lexicon. So in that way, it is not easy for a foreigner to learn Indian
classical forms because we first must become familiar with the way of life of
this or that community, be exposed to their daily chronicles, learn about
their history and their mythological arquetypes. So, only after that one can
cognize such complex and layered syllabus, and that is actually when steps will
have meaning.
In
another hand I have experienced quite a few times that in this globalized
world, sometimes a fresh eye can reveal aspects of a particular tradition that
have long been hidden by the so many turns mankind takes on writing its own
history. Like Ragini Devi for example, an American dancer who came to India in
the late twenties, to some extent rediscover the greatness of Kathakali.
Even myself have come across situations here in modern India, where I
struggled to remind some art partners, both dancers and musicians, that
if we are going to count on the clock the amount of money we make for our
creative proccess, better to start looking for a an office 7to5 kind of job.
Nevertheless,
by the grace of God I have had wonderful Gurus here who have given me genuine
reference and the proper guidance towards my own research on Indian classical
dance and its original sacred forms.
We're
seeing considerable fusion being applied to traditional dance forms now — what
are your views on this trend?
Most
fusion works to me look like con-fusion
Not
because I don’t believe that different styles or art forms couldn’t or shouldn’t
communicate. But because things take time. If I want to interact with an Indian
person in Hindi, I must learn some Hindi. Same thing the other way around. That
takes time. The thing is that most con-fusionists are moved by immediatistic
commercial trends, influenced by the never satisfying consumerism, from where
mostly noisy non-sense art products are being produced all over the globe.
Fusion
is unavoidable in today's world; it actually represents a big chunk of the
world's voice in our present time. But again, communication is about talking
and listening, it’s about learning, where taking is also a form of giving.
Many of
the maestros have a spiritual approach towards their music/dancing. Do you
believe music/dancing connects with a higher being?
I have
come to realize by the practice of the anga bhedas and abhinaya in
general, its profound power of self -sculpting oneself from both
inside out and outside in, and of how the consciousness of
gesture makes living a dance of its own. In that way, as far as I am
concerned Indian Classical Dances are a very complete form of yoga
practice, as a path to Divine archetypical embodiment, raising the aesthetic
experience to the level of spiritual contemplation.
Nonetheless
I believe that the arts in general can bring one to such place of self-rapture,
where the thin line between Creator and Creation vanishes, so that the artist
disappears for the Art to be revealed.
What is
your advice to budding artists and dance enthusiasts?
Well,
quoting from Neitzsche: ”We should consider everyday lost in which we don't
dance. "
The life
of an artist is a life of devotion, a life of offering and sacrifice, where
through our sadhanas we bring ourselves in the face of mystery to realize the
unimaginable power of the body to transcend its own physical limitations.
So let’s make it sacred, let’s keep it sacred, let’s make our dance
studios as holy grounds, knowing that in that place for dance, we bring
ourselves to a place of prayer, that more than anything else, it’s about
offering...
No comments:
Post a Comment